Is there more than one way to keep a fish?


Editor's Picks
Practical Fishkeeping Readers' Poll 2023
Fishkeeping News Post
Readers' Poll 2023
07 August 2023
Fishkeeping News Post
Countdown for Finest Fest 2023
20 April 2023
Fishkeeping News Post
Pacific Garbage Patch becomes its own ecosystem
20 April 2023
Fishkeeping News Post
Newly described snails may already be extinct
20 April 2023
There’s definitely more than one way to skin a cat, so why shouldn’t there be more than one way to keep a fish? Just stop bickering and worry about your own livestock...Oh to be young again.

“Then there was like a sea of dirty, smelly old men trying to get at your humble Narrator, with their feeble rookers and horny old claws. It was Old Age having a go at Youth and I daren’t do a single solitary thing, O my brothers...” Anthony Burgess, A Clockwork Orange. 

Nathan Hill is Practical Fishkeeping magazine’s editor, biotope fancier and aquascape dabbler, who is slowly being overwhelemed by young Julidochromis ornatus. 

Welcome one, welcome all...

I’m wrinkled enough at 45 to put myself in the old aquarist camp now. In fishkeeping terms, I’m a relic in a hobby where younglings often dominate the new media. 

We older aquarists routinely get accused of gatekeeping, of muscling out the newcomers. I heartily disagree, and while I agree that some of my old timer friends can be surly, unhelpful and cantankerous, I find that the worst people for alienating newcomers tend to be those who are only themselves fresh out of fishy boot camp. 

Being armed with a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, and nowhere is that as true as it is in fishkeeping. This hobby is vast, and packed with nuance and subtlety. 

After three months of keeping aquaria, we can hope that a newcomer will understand the basics of the nitrogen cycle. 

They might grasp the concept of ‘bacteria changes bad stuff into better stuff’ but they probably don’t know the pH level at which nitrification ceases, nor of the reduced efficiency of autotrophic bacteria in cooler water. But that won’t stop them from condemning how someone else chooses to set up a tank — a tank that our less-informed noobs may be completely unable to apply their limited understanding to. 

By contrast, there’s the weird sense of self-prestige that comes with age, and insolence at the idea a younger person might know as much as you. My girlfriend (who works in the industry) experiences this a lot, usually in the format of ‘I’ve been keeping fish since before you were alive...’ 

I’ve held a long and personal grudge with that mindset. There are things I’ve been doing my entire life that I am terrible at. Time served means nothing if you’ve done absolutely nothing with that time. 

Who’s right?

So where does this leave us? What worries me is an increase of old and new tribalism, and that seems to be getting ramped up already in 2021; people circling their respective wagons and attacking anything that dares approach.

Some older aquarists appear to disregard new ideas from younger fishkeepers because they’ve ‘always done it their way’, while younger aquarists appear to dismiss advice from the old guard because, in being vintage, it must somehow be obsolete. Throughout all of this, the only tragic victim seems to be open-mindedness. 

Here’s your thought for the day. Someone might approach fishkeeping in a different way to you, and you both could be right.

It isn’t a contest to prove that your method is the only infallible one that can exist. Because in most of fishkeeping, most of the time, that just ain’t true. 

Someone who’s been keeping fish for decades might have wild-caught Neon tetra in a 60 litre blackwater biotope with next to no hardness and 4.5pH, and may have done that since the 90s. A young and excitable YouTuber after their first year of fishkeeping might have farmed Neon tetra in a 120 litre aquascape, heavily planted in medium hard water at 6.8pH. Both fish could be happy and spawning, both could be show winners. Each of these aquarists will have their own experience of how it ‘should’ be done. But who’s the most ‘right’? Well, neither and both, that’s who...

Nathan Hill