Sealed condom aquarium causes stir
A video showing how to make a 'self-sustained' aquarium from a water-filled condom is causing a stir on the forum.
Don't try this at home.

Practical Fishkeeping Forum regular Bennystalebread (not his real name) pointed out a shocking video today which shows how you can make an ecosphere-like aquarium from a condom.
The video below, which Bennystalebread found on Metacafe, shows a condom being rinsed, filled with water and then decorated with some gravel and a live aquatic plant.
Two Neon tetras are added and the whole thing is sealed up, with no air gap, by tying a knot in the top of the condom.
Practical Fishkeeping forum users, myself included, have been gobsmacked by the stupidity of the idea. But worryingly, some users of the Metacafe site where the video is hosted, seem to think that the idea is a good one.
Ecosphere aquariums, which the user is trying to imitate, are quite controversial. They are sealed spherical aquariums containing seawater, algae and some small shrimp and are sold as "the world's first totally enclosed ecosystem."
They claim that natural processes occuring within the sphere, break down the shrimp's wastes and photosynthesis allows the algae to produce oxygen.
Whatever you think of them, though, we really hope that nobody follows this person's advice and tries to create their own sealed aquarium using a condom. It really isn't going to work.

Views: This entry has been read 42,022 times.
56 comments on: Sealed condom aquarium causes stir
Jump to comments form
"Surely the residue's of spermicide and chemical's, rinsed or not, will harm the fish?
What idiocy!
It will turn into yet another sad waste of fish life"
Date: Thursday January 17th, 2008, 6:42 pm
"Attention seeker. And it's working."
Posted by: George Farmer - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Thursday January 17th, 2008, 7:15 pm
"this idiot actcually thinks this is a "self-sustained" ecosystem?? don't make me laugh even my 12 year old sister knows its imposible. but the gusy is actually getting credit for it...some people or are really stupid or play dumb as a hobby."
Posted by: Chris Carbone - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Thursday January 17th, 2008, 9:08 pm
"Think George hit the nail on the head!
Still it is appauling that someone would even think of doing this let alone go through with it."
Date: Thursday January 17th, 2008, 10:08 pm
"I would like to add that a number of chemicals are present with the lubricant present on most condoms, for example polyethylene glycol (PEG), spermicides such as Nonoxynol-9 and sometimes flavourings, colourings and other chemicals used as 'warmining' agents and those used to 'prolong enjoyment'.
Studies show that PEG can cause skin irritation in humans and animals and also show that the frequent use of nonoxynol-9 can induce lesions and ulcerations to genital mucosa of humans.
I doubt the brief rinsing that people may give to the condom they choose to use for their ''ecosystem'' will completely remove all of these components. Any remaining could potentially cause the fish discomfort and distress."
Date: Thursday January 17th, 2008, 11:31 pm
"What a stupid idea, does he really expect this to work. The sad thing is people will try this out."
Posted by: Tobias Burton - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Saturday January 19th, 2008, 5:27 pm
"To summarise, a slow painful torture for the fish by this idiot. Sadly it will be copied by others too."
Posted by: Sylvia Fadries - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Saturday January 19th, 2008, 6:04 pm
"I wonder if he would like it if he was put inside a balloon and starved of oxygen."
Posted by: Thomas Nicholls - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Monday January 21st, 2008, 10:13 am
"Thats terrible and wrong.Idiots :("
Posted by: Stacey Malton - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Tuesday January 22nd, 2008, 10:51 pm
"The condom would be better suited if the guy/gal had have put it on there head.
"
Date: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 4:21 pm
"what an idiot,he obvoiusly has to much time on his hands and not enough brain cells,the scary thing is that alot of people will be misled in to thinking this is acceptable....."
Posted by: Craig Bicknell - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 4:24 pm
"one other thing how the hell do you feed the fish you moron"
Posted by: Gavin Wheater - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 4:34 pm
"Ah, if only his father had had some foresight..."
Posted by: Mary Sweeney - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 4:35 pm
"I don't understand why the site has allowed the video to stay. The creator of the video is clearly an idiot but the site should weed out such people and not show them."
Posted by: Joanne Anderson - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 4:37 pm
"Pitty his father didn't use one of these for its intended purpose.
Wonder how he would feel if I shoved him into a 6' x 6' x 6' cubical, shoved some plants in there and sealed the whole thing shut?
Not to mention I'd have to spray the inside first with a variety of noxious chemicals which over time will cause irritation and discomfort..."
Date: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 4:43 pm
"No way to feed the fish, no way to get oxygen in the water...DOH!! Obiously not a fish lover here. "
Posted by: Holly Etzweiler - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 4:58 pm
"Apart from being ridiculous - how do you feed them or clean them out!!!! Its worse than the little jars Siamese fighters are put in. I am appauled that you have even given it space on your site."
Posted by: Tricia Petherick - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 5:03 pm
"when i saw this i thought it was gross like everyone else has said it is completly stupid wonder how long those neon tetras lived for? im 11 and got a subscription for pfk for my birthday because i love the mag so much and i decided that i wanted a tank but i looked into it first saved up and bought a juwel 100 litre aquarium even i know that you need to have a decent sized tank witha good filter and heater to keep your fish healthy and happy therefore making a condom not a sutible enviorment for fish and strongly advise no one to copy this idiot."
Posted by: Mia Raghunath - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 5:14 pm
"idiot"
Posted by: Mike O'sullivan - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 5:24 pm
"I feel saddened that there are idiots like this in the world, using live creatures for their own amusement, with no concern for their wellbeing. "
Posted by: Hilary Langdon - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 5:40 pm
"I do wish PFK would remove this video from their site!!
They will not print this wish,- my last comments were not included - obviously they were inappropriate too!
[Ed's note: We don't publish all comments submitted, but those shown will reflect the balance of comments we received. A large number of comments are rejected for legal reasons.]
The chap who submitted 'this sickening offering' in the name of a video purporting to support fish by insertion in a condom is, needless to say, a consummate attention seeker.
I am concerned, nothing more, for the next fish he experiments with in this way in an oxygenless environment. The liklihood will diminish with less publicity."
Date: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 6:50 pm
"Just one more sad example of the attitude "they're just fish".
Not to mention there is no such word as "wallah". The word is "voila". It's French.
"
Date: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 7:24 pm
"As you will see from the hit count on this article, it has now been viewed nearly 9000 times. A number of other sites have also picked up on this story.
While this might well be providing some publicity to the possibly attention seeking poster of the video, if it prevents one person from trying this at home I personally feel that it's been beneficial to show it. "
Date: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 7:33 pm
"What an utter moron!"
Posted by: Pauline Fraser - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 7:37 pm
" Quite a crual way of keeping the fish, and I dont really see how the fish could actually find enough to eat, as well how quickly the water will become contaminated and not be able to replenish itself quick enough by forms of breaking down the waste. A bad example, and many other comments about chemicals are quite true.
I remember a science exam paper I sat for biology that had a self sustaining eco-system as mentioned by others suggesting it would work and that it was ok to do that type of thing, but I also have to mention that it did state the fact that it was based on theory, even though they didn't suggest anything was wrong with it.
"
Date: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 7:44 pm
"I feel bad for the fishes."
Posted by: Vivien Yin - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 10:34 pm
"what a complete dipstick.This guy has no respect for what he's putting them fish through.Sad Sad man!!!"
Posted by: Mark Cline - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 10:45 pm
"did he not consider that plants produce CO2 at night, not oxygen, so the aquarium is not self sustaining, small volume and condom chemicals aside"
Posted by: James Howard - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Wednesday January 23rd, 2008, 11:38 pm
"As a fish shop owner, this sort of thing makes me feel sick, I just hope the fish did not suffer for long or the idiot sore sence and returned them to the tank."
Posted by: David Ferrero - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Thursday January 24th, 2008, 10:35 am
"George has hit the nail on the head. Just don't hit the website and this idiot won't think he's onto a good thing. Personally I would have him in front of a firing squad, and happily pull the trigger."
Posted by: Gary White - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Thursday January 24th, 2008, 10:51 am
"What a muppet,hes obviousl not all there in the head!!"
Posted by: Daniel Giacomelli - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Thursday January 24th, 2008, 11:10 am
"At least the fish are in water and its not a used condom, thats a start - better than putting them in a toilet bowl.
Poor little fish, they do not deserve such treatment."
Date: Thursday January 24th, 2008, 1:29 pm
"What a muppet,hes obviousl not all there in the head and the white coats should beafter him"
Posted by: Kit Morrison - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Thursday January 24th, 2008, 1:39 pm
"The fact that he used the smallest fish commonly available - a neon tetra - makes it seem that this person actually kind of considered that there wouldn't be enough oxygen for the #1 martyr of the fish world, a goldfish. If all he was after was attention, and he knew he would seem cruel to fishkeepers, why not use a feeder goldfish since it's only a quarter? (Err, crown? Sorry, I'm a yank.) I know it seems unlikely, but I have a feeling that this person actually thought this would work. This isn't the first time anyone has thought of making an aquarium that holds just a few dribbles of water, Google palmtop aquariums and you'll see other examples. Obviously these were actually *tasteful* but still, why do people feel an urge to create these mini aquatic ecosystems? Just food for thought..."
Posted by: Nicole Putnam - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Thursday January 24th, 2008, 1:43 pm
"Am I the only one who is remembering that there are laws against animal cruelty and that charges SHOULD be pressed against this guy? There is NO such thing as a man made "self sustained" ecosystem, they dont work! This is a blaintint disregard for the health and happiness of the living creatures sealed tightly in that rubber."
Posted by: Mike Grublis - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Thursday January 24th, 2008, 2:49 pm
"Obviously, this person has no love for animals at all. I think this person should be reported to the RSPCA, or the equivalent. What a stupid thing to do, but the frightning thing is that other people out there will copy what he has done, thinking it's a laugh."
Posted by: Darren Bailey - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Thursday January 24th, 2008, 9:35 pm
"What a moron!!"
Posted by: Cheryl Steeves - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Friday January 25th, 2008, 6:42 am
"Whoever created this clearly has no respect for animals. Too many fish die through morons like this creater, and its about time the got prosecuted through cruelty to animals."
Posted by: Lee Smith - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Friday January 25th, 2008, 7:59 pm
"I just cant believe what ive just seen, i thoutht goldfish being hung up in small bags as fairground prizes was bad enough but this defies belief! People like this make me sick, just because they are fish that seems to make it ok to be able to sacrifice their lives in order to earn respect from equal minded ignorant morons who will probably label it as "cool". what i would really like to do is to feed the guy who did this to my oscars but then i guess they would spit him out because even oscars have taste!!!"
Posted by: Howard Sugars - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Friday January 25th, 2008, 8:29 pm
"this is disgusting, but i don't think he is being serious, but still cruelty to animals"
Posted by: Jamie Alderson - 1 year, 9 months agoDate: Saturday January 26th, 2008, 4:39 pm
"How can things like this be policed? someone somewhere should be told about this in a legal sense so that these morons can be shown the extent of their cruelty in the a court of law. That should bring the message home.
This is not the only cruel fish "sport" out there there is I understand a video of pirahna eating a live mouse!!!! This is not the fault of the fish but that of the miserable torturers.
How can we as caring fishkeepers who spend hours looking after our fish help to prevent this horror. Poor little fish, when you see the trouble a nitrite spike causes think how much suffering the chemicals in a condom will cause. I hope they are dead quickly."
Date: Saturday January 26th, 2008, 5:46 pm
"I just read the comments on the actual site from other people who have watched the video. I think I have just lost faith in humanity. As Jimmy Carr said - time for a little chlorine to be added to the gene pool..."
Posted by: Denny Gamble - 1 year, 9 months agoDate: Sunday January 27th, 2008, 9:20 pm
"I am sorry to day this but aren't we getting things a little out of proportion? It is one neon tetra that is being used for an experiment.
I keep fish myself and gain a lot of enjoyment from my hobby but do not mourn the death of individual fish."
Date: Monday January 28th, 2008, 9:54 am
"I do not agree, if he is doing this to one tetra on video, imagine what he might do off video.
I'm upset when any of my fish die. I put them into individual match boxes and place them into the garden with a lolli-pop stick above them. It is a very special area of the garden for me."
Date: Monday January 28th, 2008, 12:21 pm
"stupid thing to do "
Posted by: Angla Perrin - 1 year, 9 months agoDate: Wednesday January 30th, 2008, 7:37 pm
"simon wiggins...
It may only be 1 small tetra that you are looking at, and even with 1 tetra its a cruel act, but you are not considering how many people will follow this persons lead, and it wont end with 1 tetra."
Date: Friday February 1st, 2008, 10:21 am
"I think this is the worst thing I've seen since the goldfish in the heels of platform shoes in the early 70's.
Apart from the obvious drawbacks, how does he intend to feed these poor creatures? Like the goldfish mentioned above, are they to be left to starve to death if they last that long. I believe a prosicution by the RSPCA is in order, if it was a pair of dogs in a plastic bag or two kittens in a canvas sack there would be no hesitation."
Date: Monday February 4th, 2008, 2:41 pm
"Oh my god! I have never seen something so stupid! There was a craze a few years ago to have mini aquariums about 4" wide and they were banned thankfully, because the fish cannot survive in something that small, or at least the maintenance is to big for the people intending on buying them, not to mention water quality fluctuations. It is lacking in all the basic requirements of keeping a fish - Oxygen, Heat, PH, Ammonia, Nitrite, Nitrate, Light and Food. None of these have been taken into consideration this is before even thinking about the chemicals that cannot be removed from it!
I think it is sad that some websites allow vidoes of such animal cruelty to be shown to the world, if the people watching the videos were well educated they would be leaving the same kind of remarks as shown here. Perhaps people don't realise it wont work."
Date: Tuesday February 5th, 2008, 4:56 pm
"Try complaining to Meta Cafe. They won't do a thing. Just like You Tube. These sites are a liability when it comes to animal welfare."
Posted by: Rachel Beckett - 1 year, 9 months agoDate: Wednesday February 6th, 2008, 1:10 pm
"Rachel: you're right, these video sharing websites are much too lax. I know lots of people are talking about prosecuting the makers of the video but this isn't really going to pan out, of course. The real harm anyway is not the couple of neons that suffered but the very real possibility that this will imitated...and who do we have to blame in that regard? Meta Cafe! Why is there not a terms of use agreement against uploading videos that depict animal cruelty? I looked on You Tube's site and other than copyright infringement and commercial use, the violations are things like "pornography, obscene or defamatory material, or excessive length". I can think of a few other things to add in there...like animal cruelty! Similar to what someone else said, if this were a cat being sealed up in a big see-through bag with a bowl of kibbles, there would be a quite a stir. "
Posted by: Nicole Putnam - 1 year, 9 months agoDate: Thursday February 7th, 2008, 1:32 pm
"If you consider it a self-sustained ecosystem, you dont have a clue!"
Posted by: Luca Mercuri - 1 year, 9 months agoDate: Saturday February 9th, 2008, 1:19 am
"Self sustained eco-system! What nonsense!"
Posted by: Christian Tanti - 1 year, 9 months agoDate: Monday February 11th, 2008, 11:43 pm
"This makes a bowl look positively 5 star accommodation! Very sad-poor fish."
Posted by: John Simmonds - 1 year, 9 months agoDate: Wednesday February 20th, 2008, 11:07 pm
"what a incredible idea!! im going to copy it!,then im going to invade poland,refuse america tax breaks,split up the middle east after a long war,and finaly im going to buy shares in northern rock!...........................or maybey not eh?"
Posted by: Matthew Colville - 1 year, 8 months agoDate: Monday February 25th, 2008, 6:16 pm
"Oh, come on the guy is obviously not going to keep the fish in there. People are clearly overreacting.
And by the way there is actually a self sustaining system called Ecosphere that is not far from what this guy has done. It's made of glass and has shrimp instead of fish but everything else is similar. Google about it ;)"
Date: Tuesday June 10th, 2008, 11:17 pm
Your comments
We don't publish all comments submitted, but those shown will reflect the balance of comments we received. We won't publish your email address, but your name and location may appear alongside these comments online, and if they are printed in the magazine.









"The worrying thing is that the person who made that obviously knows a bit about fishkeeping (bacteria, nitrogen cycle etc) and he still did it! not to mention the lack of dechlorinator!"
Posted by: Jack Hampson - 1 year, 10 months agoDate: Thursday January 17th, 2008, 5:37 pm